Reporting: sourced factual coverage reviewed by the editorial desk.
Further Asset Management says it is embedding Chainlink technology in a new compliance platform intended to check transactions involving tokenized assets against configured rules in Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM).
In an October 27 announcement, Chainlink said Further's Anubis platform would use its Automated Compliance Engine to evaluate transactions before execution. The initial focus is workflows relevant to requirements of ADGM's Financial Services Regulatory Authority. The companies describe controls covering matters such as identity checks, ownership, trading, custody and sanctions.
For readers, the distinction is that a digital representation of an asset still needs rules about who may hold or transfer it. Software can help apply selected controls at the point of a transaction, but the quality of that check depends on the rules and information configured by the institutions using it. An announcement of a technical approach does not itself establish regulatory approval or guarantee compliance.
The release describes an initial deployment focused on ADGM and says Further plans to extend the platform to other jurisdictions and counterparties. It also describes a dashboard as planned. The announcement does not identify completed transaction volumes or name institutions already using Anubis; it says the companies plan to announce milestones as institutions adopt it. Those future steps should not be mistaken for demonstrated broad adoption.
The project concerns the movement and administration of tokenized assets. The announcement does not establish that investors must buy a particular token or that the integration will affect its price.
Sources & evidence
Chainlink — Further Asset Management announcement, October 27, 2026 ↗
Author disclosure
AI assisted research and drafting from the named primary announcement; no interviews or independent product tests were conducted. RailsRecord is a Joaico publication; material holdings have not been established.
Corrections
Identify this article and the disputed claim in a correction request to corrections@railsrecord.com ↗. The publisher reviews supporting primary evidence.


Reader discussion
Comment on this article or reply to another reader. Comments and replies are held for review before appearing publicly.
Loading discussion…